Defending the Integrity
of Our Institutions
A pro-growth agenda requires durable institutions, which today are under sustained assault. As our collective numbness grows, public attention may fade, enabling standards to reset. This ledger preserves a factual record in order to counter the inevitability of this outcome.
Institutions erode gradually when violations of norms become routine and public attention fades. Desensitization, not disagreement, poses the greatest long-term threat to institutional stability.
OFA’s contribution is not extended commentary or moral argument. It is preservation of record. The material that follows is a cumulative, factual list of documented institutional breaches and norm violations. Its purpose is to counter collective amnesia, provide historical clarity, and make visible the scale and persistence of conduct that threatens the institutional foundations on which growth and opportunity depend.
Institutional Integrity Ledger
This ledger is updated regularly as new institutional developments are documented and verified.
Violation of USMCA Trade Agreement and Circumvention of Supreme Court Ruling - February 2025 to August 2026
Trump negotiated and signed the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement in his first term, replacing NAFTA in 2020. Beginning February 1, 2025, he imposed sweeping tariffs on Canada under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, violating the terms of the agreement he had created. Canada retaliated with targeted tariffs on U.S. automobiles, alcohol, and dairy. Three federal courts ruled the IEEPA tariffs unlawful, and on February 20, 2026, the Supreme Court affirmed 6-3 that IEEPA does not grant the president authority to impose tariffs - a power the Constitution assigns to Congress. The same day, Trump announced replacement tariffs under a different statute. After trade negotiations with Canada collapsed in August 2026, he invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930 - never previously used by any president - to impose 50% tariffs on Canadian automobiles, alcohol, and dairy. The U.S. also declined to renew USMCA for a full term on July 1, 2026, shifting it to annual reviews. The sequence illustrates a pattern of violating legal agreements, using executive authority beyond its legal limits, absorbing judicial rebukes, and immediately seeking alternative mechanisms to achieve the same result.
DOJ Uses False Claims Act to Extract DEI Settlements from Federal Contractors - April-August 2026
The Justice Department's Civil Rights Fraud Initiative, launched in May 2025, has secured settlements from IBM ($17 million, April 2026) and Deloitte ($21.5 million, August 2026) over DEI hiring practices at firms holding federal contracts. Both cases were brought under the False Claims Act, a statute historically used to prosecute healthcare and defense procurement fraud, on the theory that the firms falsely certified compliance with anti-discrimination requirements while maintaining race and sex-based hiring goals. Neither firm admitted wrongdoing. Google and Verizon have received document requests. Legal experts have noted the novel use of a fraud statute to regulate private employment practices at companies whose only connection to the federal government is a contractor relationship.
Capture of Foreign Head of State Without Authorization
U.S. forces captured a foreign leader without congressional authorization, raising concerns about executive war powers and constitutional requirements.
Expansion of Executive Authority Claims in Litigation
Justice Department filings advanced broad interpretations of presidential immunity, testing limits of executive authority in ongoing legal proceedings.
Deployment of National Guard in Response to Protests
The administration authorized National Guard deployment in response to protests, raising concerns about federal authority and balance between state and federal control.
Invocation of Military Authority Under Contested Rationale
The administration relied on disputed legal authority to deploy military resources domestically, prompting legal challenges over scope of executive power.
Census Citizenship Question Dispute
The administration pursued a citizenship question despite legal challenges, with courts finding the stated rationale insufficient under administrative law standards.
National Emergency Declaration for Border Funding
Trump declared a national emergency to redirect funds after Congress declined full wall funding, expanding executive authority over appropriations.
Assertion of Presidential Self-Pardon Authority
Trump asserted he could pardon himself, prompting constitutional debate over limits of executive power and accountability under law.
Imposition of Tariffs Under National Security Authority
The administration imposed tariffs using national security justification, expanding executive discretion in trade policy traditionally influenced by Congress.
Appointment of Acting CFPB Director Amid Dispute
The administration installed an acting CFPB director during a succession dispute, triggering litigation over statutory interpretation and executive authority.
Rescission of DACA Program
The administration ended DACA, prompting legal challenges over administrative process and executive authority in reversing established immigration protections.
Travel Ban Executive Order
The administration restricted entry from several countries by executive order, prompting judicial intervention over scope and legality of executive authority.